Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Echinoderm Tube Feet Don't Suck! They Stick!

Side B
Image taken by Barry Fackler

Do tube feet actually use suction as has been historically thought/taught??

The whole "tube feet use suction" paradigm is a powerful one that has been observed since some of the earliest work on starfish in the 1840s. 

Its a powerful and seemingly straightforward idea. Tube feet have what appears to be a suction cup on the tip of their tube feet, and so, therefore, shouldn't it work like one??

Could this long-standing notion... BE WRONG???
20040128_4 Podia of starfish, Asterias rubens (Sweden)
Image by "ratexla"/Josefine Stenudo
The suction cup idea is pervasive and can be seen in many pop culture references.

How pervasive?  The authors of the paper I use below cite Peach the sea star from the recent movie Finding Nemo by Pixar- Peach uses the popping sounds that one associates with a rubber sucker!!
A new, recent paper from the bioadhesion labs of Patrick Flammang in Belgium, and Romana Santos and Elise Hennebert in Portugal have demonstrated several experiments that in fact, tube feet rely on adhesion (as outlined here before) and NOT on suction. This paper is OPEN ACCESS and can be found here at the Proceedings of the 7th European Echinoderm Conference! 

The paper is important to people who study echinoderms but is very straightforward and pretty easy to understand...  The authors work primarily on two species as test subjects:  
The common N. Atlantic sea star Asterias rubens
Common Starfish,Filey Brigg,North Yorkshire.
Image by Juncea
and the European urchin Paracentrotus lividus...
Paracentrotus Lividus
Photo by Marco Cortesi
Even before this recent work on adhesion in tube feet, there had been indicators, some years ago that suction was not the only force in tube feet at play. Why?

First-A study from 1985 (Thomas & Hermans) showed that echinoderms have been observed adhering to screens, meshes and grates-so how would a suction cup work if they were being applied on a porous surface with no way to create a vaccum?

Second.Tube feet leave footprints such as this one which leave behind residue suggesting a glue or adhesive was at play..
In order to test whether suction played an active role in adhesion (in other words they attempted to DISPROVE the role of suction), the authors approached the problem with some very insightful observations/ experiments.

1. Observing the tube feet directly!
The physics of your basic suction cup model is pretty straightforward. The suction cup creates a large suction cavity between the attached foot and the substrate (i.e., the ground).  

When you put a suction cup down, you press the top down and pull it up. This creates the suction cavity that attaches the suction cup to the ground..that's what you would expect.

Tube feet from Asterias (the starfish) and Paracentrotus (the urchin) were sampled immediately after it was clear they were attached, and photographed with a Scanning Electron Microscope. Histological (i.e. tissue) sections were also taken...

The top two pics (A+B) show an unattached tube foot.. But C through F? all show those attached to the bottom.
Figure  1 from Hennebert, Santos and Flammang, 2012
What they found? There was NO "suction cavity" between the tube foot edge and the substrate (i.e. the ground). The tube foot disc surface was actually flat and flush with the substrate surface. Thus, no physical evidence for suction could be observed.
The authors indicate that suction may still play a secondary role, serving in conjunction with the adhesion/glue but for the most part it doesn't look like suction is a primary influence here.

2. Measuring the Attachment Strength of the tube feet
Next, Hennebert and her coauthors measured the attachment strength of the tube feet relative to different variables. These included

A. Measuring the strength or tenacity (in terms of Force or Tenacity) of sea urchins as they hung from a glass plate at different angles.
They tested the adhesion of the tube feet on glass relative to detachment force (how hard they pulled) and pulling angle (the direction). That is they tried to pull it off and at different angles on a smooth glass surface.
fr. Fig. 3A in Hennebert et al. 2013
If this were truly suction then the tube feet would slide (i.e., no resistance) and the amount of suction would decrease. There was no (or at least no statistical) relationship between the detachment force and the pulling angle.

B. Measure strength and tenacity on a porous bottom
This one was more straightforward-if tube feet are anchored by suction, then an imperfect bottom (i.e. substrate) won't really work well as a good anchoring ground. 

The authors used a sheet of plastic with holes present in the surface.  They measured tube feet with a device that measure the force and tenacity and then recorded the footprints based on whether they completely, partially or did not cover the holes.  

Prediction:  If the tube feet use suction-the force measurements for strength and tenacity would be significantly affected. But if adhesion was at play, then the holes should make no difference.

Basically, this experiment mirrors the early observations of watching starfish or urchins moving around on a metal grate or mesh. How important can suction be if the animal can move on a non-porous surface?

 No statistical differences were found between the different groups (i.e., the tube feet that walked over a complete, partial or covered hole). 

CONCLUSION!  And so, not only has prior work (see earlier blog post) shown the huge role of adhesion/glue in the way tube feet work but now, the original historical model..i.e., tube feet use suction has been pretty effectively undermined if not disproven outright!
Its possible of course that there are further refinements to how all of this works in sea cucumbers and crinoids but starfish and sea urchins have always been the "model organism" for studying tube feet in echinoderms. 

One of the oldest and most widely known perceptions about echinoderms? Not the case. Evidence is slowly building up against it and an important lesson in science that even the most long-standing ideas can be overturned when you look at the facts with the right questions!

5 comments:

Andrew said...

Thanks Chris. I'm about to start another year of teaching young children marine studies and I always warn them about picking up echinoderms and damaging their "sucker tube feet". I shall now call them "sticky tube feet". I'm now subscribing to your blog too!

Alex Hirsekorn said...

Hi Chris,
As a first time visitor to The Echinoblog I very much enjoyed this post!
I'm a docent at the Feiro Marine Life Center in Port Angeles, WA and have been teaching the duo-gland adhesive model for 2 or 3 years now. Allow me to present some less rigorous evidence of how tube feet hold on to things:
We have a number of stars and other echinoderms in our touch tanks and, despite our best efforts to prevent it, it's not uncommon for a star to get hold of one of our visitors. When that happens it's up to one of us to separate the two; not an easy task and often ends with at least a few tube feet stuck to the visitor. If the suction cup model was true, one would expect those detached feet to relax and easily come off; they don't. They continue to stick with the same tenacity as when there was still a star attached and that would seem to support the adhesive model.
I like to warn our visitors about not touching the star's feet by saying that "They are very good at grabbing you but very bad at letting go!" I sometimes go on to explain that we really don't mind if a star wants to eat someone but that we're concerned that the animal might be injured if we try to interrupt the attempt. Some visitors seem to think that I'm joking!

Adhesively yours,
Alex

ChrisM said...

Thank you! Always great to hear from volunteers and from those of you learning and gathering active experimental data in the field!

A gluetastic good evening!

Noor Azri said...

hi chris,

i have a query.so how do the tube feet push/pull themselves when moving on sand?
cause the grains are so light as compared to their body, i dont think the sand can act as an anchor for them to push/pull themselves forward, ya?
or is it that the effects of sliding been greatly reduced by having a large no of tube feet? thanks!

ChrisM said...

A lot of the dynamics of how tube feet work are still being understood. Some sea stars which are commonly found on loose sediment, such as Luidia or Astropecten have pointed tube feet and may not use exactly the same kind of mechanism.

As for other species, however, its unclear.I suspect however that there is some flexibility as to how the tube feet work when the animals move over sediment.